<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>Qwen on VibePapa — Tech from the Boseong River</title>
    <link>https://boseonggang.com/tags/qwen/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Qwen on VibePapa — Tech from the Boseong River</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2026 07:06:59 +0900</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://boseonggang.com/tags/qwen/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Six Old Books Translated for $1.20: Why I Stopped Cutting and Scanning</title>
      <link>https://boseonggang.com/posts/six-books-translated-for-1-dollar-20-cents-deepseek-vs-local-qwen/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2026 07:06:59 +0900</pubDate>
      <guid>https://boseonggang.com/posts/six-books-translated-for-1-dollar-20-cents-deepseek-vs-local-qwen/</guid>
      <description>I planned to cut the spines off six Korean commentary volumes and scan them. Then I found the English originals in a public-domain library and translated all six with DeepSeek for about $1.20. Why local Qwen was not good enough, what the pipeline checks, and what is still unreviewed.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>A Bible Library That Answers With Its Sources: Sermons, a Commentary and Three Bibles in One Search</title>
      <link>https://boseonggang.com/posts/bible-library-that-answers-with-its-sources/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2026 05:48:40 +0900</pubDate>
      <guid>https://boseonggang.com/posts/bible-library-that-answers-with-its-sources/</guid>
      <description>I put hundreds of sermon transcripts, a scanned commentary and three Bible texts into one local search that answers with numbered sources. Here is what works, the bug that said &amp;#39;no data&amp;#39;, the tunnel that kept dropping, and why re-reading a scanned book is still unsolved.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Local Qwen vs Gemini for Fixing a Transcript: 50 Minutes Free vs 2.3 Minutes for 9 Cents</title>
      <link>https://boseonggang.com/posts/local-qwen-vs-gemini-correcting-a-sermon-transcript/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2026 08:31:33 +0900</pubDate>
      <guid>https://boseonggang.com/posts/local-qwen-vs-gemini-correcting-a-sermon-transcript/</guid>
      <description>I wanted to correct speech-to-text errors in a Korean sermon transcript without sending it to a cloud API, so I tried a local Qwen model. It took about 50 minutes and made new mistakes. Gemini took 2.3 minutes and cost $0.086. The comparison, with numbers and what each model got wrong.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>I Marked Who Was Speaking by Ear, Then Graded the AI&#39;s Speaker Labels Against My Marks</title>
      <link>https://boseonggang.com/posts/grading-ai-speaker-labels-against-my-own-ears/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2026 07:50:08 +0900</pubDate>
      <guid>https://boseonggang.com/posts/grading-ai-speaker-labels-against-my-own-ears/</guid>
      <description>My local speech-to-text pipeline labeled who was talking in a 39-minute audio file, and I wasn&amp;#39;t sure it was right. I marked one speaker&amp;#39;s turns by hand while listening, then compared. The AI was right 91.5% of the time, and a script did the math instead of a language model.</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
